Grokipedia is an online encyclopedia powered by artificial intelligence created by xAI, which was founded by Elon Musk. Its initial beta version launched on October 27, 2025, with approximately 900,000 articles. The content is primarily created and edited by xAI’s Grok language model, and many entries were initially based on material from Wikipedia, revised and fact-checked using Grok’s AI capabilities. Articles that reuse Wikipedia material are released under the Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike license, as required for derivative works.
As opposed to Wikipedia, users of Grokipedia are not able to edit pages directly. They can, however, submit corrections using a pop-up feedback page. Musk has referred to the project as a cleaner, less biased version of Wikipedia—asserting it would “remove propaganda” from internet knowledge bases. While some have welcomed the launch, including Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger, others have challenged the neutrality and reliability of its AI-written articles.
Wikipedia’s Influence and Criticisms
Wikipedia is still the globe’s most-widely accessed free encyclopedia, kept up-to-date by volunteer editors via open editing. While successful, it has traditionally been criticized for factual inaccuracies and political bias. Several contenders have sought to redress these weaknesses over time, including Conservapedia (2006), New World Encyclopedia (2008), and Ruwiki (2023), all purporting to mitigate bias—but frequently censored for perpetuating new varieties of ideological tilt.
xAI and the Grok Model
xAI was established in 2023 with a stated mission to “understand the true nature of the universe.” The company’s flagship product, the Grok series of large language models, drives Grokipedia and is its chief content creator and editor.
History and Development
Musk’s Disputes with Wikipedia
Elon Musk’s relationship with Wikipedia has evolved over the years—first praise and then outright conflict.
- In 2021, Musk marked Wikipedia’s 20th anniversary with admiration.
- By 2022, he blamed the site for “losing objectivity.”
- In 2023, he humorously offered to give $1 billion if Wikipedia changed its name to “Dickipedia.”
- Subsequently, in 2024, Musk urged users to boycott donations for Wikipedia, referring to it as “Wokepedia.”
Strife heightened following a January 2025 event when Musk was accused of having made a Nazi-style gesture at Donald Trump’s second inauguration. When Wikipedia accounted for the scandal in great detail, Musk publicly denounced its reportage of the incident.
The Concept of Grokipedia
During a September 2025 All-In podcast conversation with investor David Sacks, Musk discussed how Grok was trained using data from Wikipedia and other knowledge sources. Sacks proposed publishing this AI-generated knowledge base under the name “Grokipedia” to rival Wikipedia’s perceived ideological bias. Musk later confirmed xAI’s plan to build a new, AI-created encyclopedia that would aim for greater balance and factual accuracy.
Launch
The beta version of Grokipedia was initially announced in early October 2025, release delayed temporarily to tackle content quality. The platform officially went live on October 27, 2025, with more than 800,000 articles.
Most of these articles closely resembled their Wikipedia counterparts, although citation styles varied. Musk stated Grokipedia was “fully open source”, but as of October 29, 2025, no public code repository or explicit licensing details (aside from Wikipedia-derived text) had been published. He guaranteed that the 1.0 version would be a tenfold improvement over the beta.
Reception
Early responses to Grokipedia centered on accuracy, bias, and transparency. Critics noted that some articles reproduced right-leaning perspectives or granted preference to Musk’s personal opinions.
- NBC News noted that Grokipedia’s piece on Musk left out the contentious inauguration gesture noted on Wikipedia.
- Forbes reported that the majority of articles—such as those relating to PlayStation 5, Lamborghini, and AMD—were largely similar to Wikipedia’s content, although reworded by Grok.
- Time magazine blamed the platform for romanticizing Musk, pointing out that his biography had unverified personal information and left out controversies.
- Wired included various false or misleading assertions, like overstated links between pornography and the AIDS epidemic, as well as speculating on social media and gender identity.
In contrast, the Wikimedia Foundation also reminded the public that Wikipedia’s human-generated content supports AI systems such as Grok, stating that “even Grokipedia relies on Wikipedia to exist.” Researchers such as Taha Yasseri resounded this, adding that large language models tend to reproduce the same prejudices present in their training data.
However, Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia and traditional critic of its bias, responded guardedly positively. He stated Grokipedia “might” be an improved option but acknowledged that even its entry on himself included AI-generated errors or hallucinations.
Grokipedia vs wikipedia
Grokipedia is an AI-driven encyclopedia developed by Elon Musk’s firm xAI as a purported rival to Wikipedia. Released in October 2025, it employs the Grok language model to automatically write and fact-check articles. Most entries are derived from Wikipedia content, but rewritten by computer and checked for bias.
In contrast to Wikipedia, users can’t edit Grokipedia articles directly—but rather propose corrections through a feedback form. Musk asserts that Grokipedia will do away with propaganda and provide more objective information, although critics argue that it has right-leaning or pro-Musk slant and is too dependent on Wikipedia’s data.
Reaction has been varied:
Some, such as Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger, welcomed the concept. Others, such as Time, Wired, and Forbes, criticized its accuracy, neutrality, and AI-only model. Briefly, Grokipedia vs Wikipedia is a battle between knowledge generated by artificial intelligence and human-friendly information, questioning truth, prejudice, and the destiny of web encyclopedias.
Grokipedia is Elon Musk’s effort to create an AI-powered version of Wikipedia; one whose purpose is to rid the world of perceived ideological bias. Though the effort has monumental scale and technological scope, its reliance on Wikipedia’s content, absence of human supervision, and obvious ideological biases have rendered it a daring experiment and a croversial one. Whether or not it can grow into a reliable source of knowledge—or merely be yet another echo of AI bias—can only be speculated upon.
Why did Elon Musk name it grok?
Musk has said he named his chatbot after a term used in the 1961 science fiction novel Stranger in a Strange Land, according to The Times of India. Author Robert A. Heinlein imagined “grok” as a word in a Martian lexicon that also meant “to understand.”
How does Grokipedia work?
Grokipedia does not have human authors, unlike Wikipedia, which is written and edited by volunteers in a transparent process. Grokipedia said it is “fact-checked” by Grok, Musk’s AI chatbot. Musk said the idea was suggested by the Trump administration’s AI and cryptocurrency czar, David Sacks.
What is Elon Musk’s grok?
Tech billionaire Elon Musk on Monday launched an online encyclopedia, named Grokipedia, that he said was fueled by artificial intelligence and designed to be closer to his conservative political views than the leading alternative, Wikipedia.
How do I open Grokipedia?
How does Musk’s Grokipedia work? If you want to use Musk’s new online encyclopedia, you will reach a homepage with a large search bar, similar to Google. You can set the colour mode and create your own account. The homepage also shows that there are currently around 885,200 articles on Grokipedia.
What is Elon Musk’s 5 minute rule?
Elon Musk’s “5-minute rule” is a method of time blocking, where his day is hyper-structured into 5-minute increments, with each block assigned a specific task. It involves scheduling every part of the day, from responding to emails to eating meals, in these tiny, focused chunks to maximize productivity and leave no room for vagueness. This granular approach helps with focus and accountability by ensuring every minute is purposeful.
Which country is no. 1 in AI?
“The U.S. keeps the title of the most AI-dominant country in 2025, outperforming every other nation with the AI compute power and the highest total power capacity at 19.8K megawatts,” a representative told me via email.
Is Grok AI better than ChatGPT?
If you need structured reasoning, accuracy, and enterprise-level reliability, ChatGPT is the better choice. If your focus is speed, humor, and staying up to date, Grok may suit you better. This guide compares both in depth to help you decide which AI fits your needs.
Has Grok-3 AI been released?
Grok 3 — ever since its release on February 17, 2025, the AI model has been making all the news in the industry. Released by xAI, an AI company by Elon Musk, Grok 3 claims to outshine all of its competitors and perform better in reasoning, logic, and many other use cases.
Is Grok safe to use?
Is Grok Safe to Use for Daily Searches, Chats, and Image Prompts? Overall, Grok is usable, but caution is smart. The tool is a fast AI search assistant built by xAI and available on the X platform, yet it draws on publicly available data and can use your activity for future model training unless you opt out.
![The Russian Federation is known to possess or have possessed three types of weapons of mass destruction: nuclear weapons, biological weapons, and chemical weapons. It is one of the five nuclear-weapon states recognized under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and one of the four countries wielding a nuclear triad. Russia possesses a total of 5,459 nuclear warheads as of 2025,[2] the largest confirmed stockpile of nuclear warheads in the world. Russia's deployed missiles (those actually ready to be launched) number about 1,718, also the largest confirmed strategically deployed arsenal in the world as of 2025.[4][5] The remaining weapons are either in reserve stockpiles, or have been retired and are slated for dismantling. Russia's predecessor state, the Soviet Union, reached a peak stockpile of about 45,000 nuclear warheads in 1986.[6] The number of weapons Russia may possess is currently controlled by the bilateral New START treaty with the United States. Russia and the United States are the world's biggest nuclear powers, holding about 88% of the world's nuclear weapons.[7] The Soviet Union ratified the Geneva Protocol—prohibiting the use of biological and chemical weapons in interstate conflicts—on April 5, 1928, with reservations that were later dropped on January 18, 2001.[8] Russia is also party to the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention and the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention.[9][10] The Soviet biological weapons program violated the Biological Weapons Convention and was the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated program of its kind.[11] At its peak, the program employed up to 65,000 people.[11] Despite being a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, Russia has continued to hold, and occasionally use[citation needed], chemical weapons. In 1997, Russia declared an arsenal of 39,967 tons of chemical weapons, which it worked in part to decrease.[12][13] Its stock of weapons was officially declared destroyed in 2017. The poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in 2018 and the poisoning of Alexei Navalny in 2020, both carried out by Russia, revealed that the country maintained an illicit chemical weapons program.[14][failed verification] Russian forces also used, and admitted to using, chemical weapons during the invasion of Ukraine.[15]](https://threadscroll.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/45-150x79.jpg)
![The Northrop B-2 Spirit is an American heavy strategic bomber that uses low-observable stealth technology to penetrate sophisticated anti-aircraft defenses. It is often referred to as a stealth bomber.[3][A] A subsonic flying wing with a crew of two, the B-2 was designed by Northrop (later Northrop Grumman) as the prime contractor, with Boeing, Hughes Aircraft Company, and Vought as principal subcontractors. It was produced from 1988 to 2000.[6][1][7] The bomber can drop conventional and thermonuclear weapons,[8] such as up to eighty 500-pound class (230 kg) Mk 82 JDAM GPS-guided bombs, or sixteen 2,400-pound (1,100 kg) B83 nuclear bombs. The B-2 is the only acknowledged in-service aircraft that can carry large air-to-surface standoff weapons in a stealth configuration. Development began under the Advanced Technology Bomber (ATB) project during the Carter administration, which cancelled the Mach 2-capable B-1A bomber in part because the ATB showed such promise, but development difficulties delayed progress and drove up costs. Ultimately, the program produced 21 B-2s at an average cost of $2.13 billion each (~$4.17 billion in 2024 dollars), including development, engineering, testing, production, and procurement.[9] Building each aircraft cost an average of US$737 million,[9] while total procurement costs (including production, spare parts, equipment, retrofitting, and software support) averaged $929 million (~$1.14 billion in 2024 dollars) per plane.[9] The project's considerable capital and operating costs made it controversial in the U.S. Congress even before the winding down of the Cold War dramatically reduced the desire for a stealth aircraft designed to strike deep in Soviet territory. Consequently, in the late 1980s and 1990s lawmakers shrank the planned purchase of 132 bombers to 21. The B-2 can perform attack missions at altitudes of up to 50,000 feet (15,000 m); it has an unrefueled range of more than 6,000 nautical miles (11,000 km; 6,900 mi) and can fly more than 10,000 nautical miles (19,000 km; 12,000 mi) with one midair refueling. It entered service in 1997 as the second aircraft designed with advanced stealth technology, after the Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk attack aircraft. Primarily designed as a nuclear bomber, the B-2 was first used in combat to drop conventional, non-nuclear ordnance in the Kosovo War in 1999. It was later used in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, and Iran.[10][11] The United States Air Force has nineteen B-2s in service as of 2024.[12] One was destroyed in a 2008 crash,[13][14] and another was likely retired from service after being damaged in a crash in 2022.[12] The Air Force plans to operate the B-2s until 2032, when the Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider is to replace them.[15]](https://threadscroll.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/360_F_1569409860_x6ox68pg2L5Ndhhl91ImN5wD0YIEiI5t-150x105.jpg)